openurl.lha network/misc - Comments

HKvalhe (80.212.47.178) @ 22 Mar 2015, 05:17.34

Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:17:34 +0100

By: HKvalhe (80.212.47.178)

Install worked for me, and i chose the MUI GUI, but bear in mind that AmigaOS 4.1 has the URL prefs itself, so. It's the normal URL prefs that is used. I could be wrong, though, but that is the impression i get.

Lemen (87.115.160.26) @ 22 Mar 2015, 12:05.05

Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:05:05 +0100

By: Lemen (87.115.160.26)

Always nice to have an update. 
Using the installer fails to update the OpenURL in Prefs from version 7.15 to 7.16. The MUI gui is also still present, even though I chose to install the reaction version.

HKvalhe (80.213.142.202) @ 11 Apr 2014, 11:39.13

Fri, 11 Apr 2014 23:39:13 +0200

By: HKvalhe (80.213.142.202)

Thank you for the update! Really appreciated! :)

lunatic (88.134.144.170) @ 28 Aug 2012, 05:44.20

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:44:20 +0200

By: lunatic (88.134.144.170)

Is there a benefit using OpenURL on OS4.1 instead UrlOpen which comes pre-installed with the OS?

djrikki (81.104.219.70) @ 25 Apr 2012, 01:23.23

Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:23:23 +0200

By: djrikki (81.104.219.70)

Two things: The most important one, this version is out of date by more than 2 years whats up? Huh, huh.. shall I just attempt to replace it myself in the hope that the original submitter didn't supply a pass-phrase? 
 
Secondly, the point of this comment, a bug report: 
 
Submitted to project openurllib on sourceforge, artifact no: 3521183 and reported on Hyperion's forums. 
OpenURL doesn't intercept URLs embedded in Ringhio notifications; through use of the BACKRXMSG="URL.." method.  Please fix asap as I want to make good use of it!

Daniel (78.145.137.127) @ 03 Jun 2010, 07:10.04

Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:10:04 +0200

By: Daniel (78.145.137.127)

This version is out-of-date, see http://aminet.net/package/comm/www/OpenURL-7.6 for the latest version.

crack (77.20.22.39) @ 02 Mar 2009, 04:51.06

Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:51:06 +0100

By: crack (77.20.22.39)

Its easier to rename the "Open URL" to "OpenURL" in the Prefs directory, than the installer works fine.

swoop (86.4.135.119) @ 15 Dec 2008, 02:01.24

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:01:24 +0100

By: swoop (86.4.135.119)

I also had to change "Prefs/Open URL" from a project to a tool to get it to run.

Swoop (86.4.135.119) @ 14 Dec 2008, 12:32.57

Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:32:57 +0100

By: Swoop (86.4.135.119)

I have just installed this, but I had to correct a couple of things inthe 
install script. 
The prefs program now has a space between Open and URL, but this is not 
reflected in the install file. I had to add the space in lines 21 & 28. After 
that the install went fine.

CentaurZ (89.80.5.27) @ 30 Dec 2007, 06:15.06

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:15:06 +0100

By: CentaurZ (89.80.5.27)

Didn't see this post was almost 2 years old...

CentaurZ (89.80.5.27) @ 30 Dec 2007, 06:11.53

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:11:53 +0100

By: CentaurZ (89.80.5.27)

@alababan 
 
Thanks for this update ! 
 
About newlib/clib, clib also rely on shared library anyway (exec, dos...), and 
newlib.library is part of OS4 the same as those ones.

abalaban (77.201.167.177) @ 29 Dec 2007, 10:18.20

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:18:20 +0100

By: abalaban (77.201.167.177)

Doh ! I forgot to update the install script !! 
And I should not have replaced the icons at the latest minute before packing the 
 
archive... 
I'll correct this, but this won't be before next year as I off for holidays.

ktadd (66.81.75.250) @ 28 Dec 2007, 07:48.51

Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:48:51 +0100

By: ktadd (66.81.75.250)

Thanks for the update! 
 
I found a couple of small problems. The installer fails when trying to install 
the preferences program because still uses the name "OpenURL" instead 
of "Open URL". This also applies to the preferences .info file as 
well. 
 
The icon for the preferences program is set as a project icon and therefore 
tries to load "Open URL" in multiview which fails. Setting the icon as 
 
a tool icon fixes it. 
 
Once these are corrected things seem to work properly. Thanks!

abalaban (82.233.50.59) @ 12 Feb 2006, 12:35.54

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:35:54 +0100

By: abalaban (82.233.50.59)

I'm not big fan about this newlib thing just because to run a program that just 
do a printf you would need to have a particular library in your system. And that 
 
defeats the purpose of C-runtime... 
However if there is enough interest I may consider it.

AlexC (66.229.32.101) @ 12 Feb 2006, 11:54.52

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:54:52 +0100

By: AlexC (66.229.32.101)

Would it be possible to have a verion of the command and preference compiled 
with -newlib to make it smaller?