rdesktop.lha network/misc - Comments

tlgrooms (130.51.175.70) @ 26 Dec 2021, 05:31.10

Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:31:10 +0100

By: tlgrooms (130.51.175.70)

Does anyone know if this allows you to specify the port to connect to?  My pc at work has a nonstandard default port and when I try to connect by using ip:port with this client, it doesn't work.  It works fine from my pc.

jPV (84.248.18.119) @ 07 Oct 2020, 04:13.18

Wed, 07 Oct 2020 16:13:18 +0200

By: jPV (84.248.18.119)

@nexus 
Try this? https://library.morph.zone/Applications/RDesktop

aGGreSSor (188.242.153.162) @ 07 Oct 2020, 08:25.08

Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:25:08 +0200

By: aGGreSSor (188.242.153.162)

Why should it work? Win 10 was released 29 july 2015, but this client was released in 2006. RDP is proprietary protocol and was update.

nexus (37.201.248.191) @ 06 Oct 2020, 05:34.13

Tue, 06 Oct 2020 17:34:13 +0200

By: nexus (37.201.248.191)

Hm. Seems not to work with windows 10? When try to connect, I immediately get the following error: 
"ERROR: recv:" 
Any comments/ideas/solution on that?

HammerD (24.43.155.58) @ 21 Mar 2006, 06:04.29

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:04:29 +0100

By: HammerD (24.43.155.58)

All outstanding GUI issues were fixed in this release.  The rdesktop binary 
itself is unchanged from the last version.

anonymous (208.46.72.228) @ 20 Mar 2006, 03:59.44

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:59:44 +0100

By: anonymous (208.46.72.228)

Ok, yet another new version.  What changed?!

anonymous (24.43.155.58) @ 21 Feb 2006, 06:44.06

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:44:06 +0100

By: anonymous (24.43.155.58)

No the version is from August 2005, but I could not release it until OS4 Update 
4 was released - with AmiSSL V3.

anonymous (65.191.33.56) @ 15 Feb 2006, 12:03.05

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:03:05 +0100

By: anonymous (65.191.33.56)

Nice readme.  But, the MOST important thing...  What changed?

McFly (84.61.211.216) @ 14 Feb 2006, 05:43.23

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:43:23 +0100

By: McFly (84.61.211.216)

great work, thx a lot :-)

anonymous (129.100.166.99) @ 14 Feb 2006, 04:01.41

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:01:41 +0100

By: anonymous (129.100.166.99)

Version string wasn't updated, but I assure you the binary was :)

abalaban (81.255.229.37) @ 14 Feb 2006, 02:42.47

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:42:47 +0100

By: abalaban (81.255.229.37)

Is there a typo or is it really a version from january *2005* ? 
If not a typo why more recent code couldn't be used ?