<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
     <rss version='2.0'>
      <channel>
       <title>processscan.lha utility/shell - Comments</title>
       <link>https://os4depot.net/?function=comments&amp;file=utility/shell/processscan.lha</link>
       <description>List processes</description>
       <language>en-gb</language>
       <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 01:04:50 +0200</lastBuildDate>
       <item> <title>xenic (174.60.214.183) @ 24 Aug 2014, 05:33.56</title> <link>https://os4depot.net/?function=comments&amp;file=utility/shell/processscan.lha</link> <description>&lt;STRONG&gt;By:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;xenic (174.60.214.183)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;pre&gt;Your program works but is archived in a way that can cause problems if the archive is extracted by Dopus4/Dopus5 or other unpacking tools. There is a leading &quot; / &quot; in from of all the files, which means it can't be extracted to a DOS device (RAM: , DH0:) etc. It must be extracted to a sub-directory and then is actually extracted one directory above the sub-directory. OS4 &quot;UnArc&quot; is smart enough to compensate for the leading &quot; / &quot; but some other extractors are not. 
Hear is how your archive looks when viewed: 
/ProcessScan/ProcessScan 
/ProcessScan/processlist.c 
/ProcessScan/processlist.h 
/ProcessScan/ProcessScan.doc 
/ProcessScan/Makefile 
/ProcessScan.info 
 
Here is how it should look: 
ProcessScan/ProcessScan 
ProcessScan/processlist.c 
ProcessScan/processlist.h 
ProcessScan/ProcessScan.doc 
ProcessScan/Makefile 
ProcessScan.info 
 
You can look at some other archive at OS4Depot to see the difference between your archive and others. 
&lt;/pre&gt;</description> <guid isPermaLink='false'>1408894436</guid> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 17:33:56 +0200</pubDate></item></channel> </rss>