| Comment by: Spectre660 (76.76.182.224) | At: 13 Nov 2016, 15:29 | File version: 1.1B |
Sam460ex closed all running clock apps before running .
-------------------------------------------------------------
SORTBENCH 1.1 (Gunnar von Boehn)
Its a CPU benchmark that stresses CPU, DCache and branch prediction.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 K Element : 1646.91 MB/sec
2 K Element : 1712.88 MB/sec
4 K Element : 1694.81 MB/sec
8 K Element : 1679.20 MB/sec
16 K Element : 512.01 MB/sec
32 K Element : 426.25 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: marko (83.248.160.12) | At: 13 Nov 2016, 03:23 | File version: 1.1B |
Sam440ep-flex 800 MHz
With plain Workbench (without WBStartup progs):
-------------------------------------------------------------
SORTBENCH 1.1 (Gunnar von Boehn)
Its a CPU benchmark that stresses CPU, DCache and branch prediction.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 K Element : 1199.11 MB/sec
2 K Element : 1209.99 MB/sec
4 K Element : 1210.13 MB/sec
8 K Element : 1199.02 MB/sec
16 K Element : 382.94 MB/sec
32 K Element : 303.50 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: marko (83.248.160.12) | At: 13 Nov 2016, 03:09 | File version: 1.1B |
On Sam440ep-flex 800MHz
-------------------------------------------------------------
SORTBENCH 1.1 (Gunnar von Boehn)
Its a CPU benchmark that stresses CPU, DCache and branch prediction.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 K Element : 1066.03 MB/sec
2 K Element : 1085.57 MB/sec
4 K Element : 1078.07 MB/sec
8 K Element : 1053.71 MB/sec
16 K Element : 344.92 MB/sec
32 K Element : 272.60 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: zzd10h (109.9.30.119) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 18:21 | File version: 1.1B |
previous comment was from me, zzd10h,
I wanted to reply to ddni and I wrongly write "ddni" as username...
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: ddni (109.9.30.119) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 18:17 | File version: 1.1B |
Ah yes, you are right, it's better :) (tested twice)
17/0.RAM Disk:sortbench> gcc -o sort -O2 sortbench.c
17/0.RAM Disk:sortbench> sort
-------------------------------------------------------------
SORTBENCH 1.1 (Gunnar von Boehn)
Its a CPU benchmark that stresses CPU, DCache and branch prediction.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 K Element : 2116.08 MB/sec
2 K Element : 2122.17 MB/sec
4 K Element : 2123.24 MB/sec
8 K Element : 2144.95 MB/sec
16 K Element : 2141.67 MB/sec
32 K Element : 1657.02 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: TSK (77.86.211.251) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 15:52 | File version: 1.1B |
Compiling the utility with -O3 gave slower speed than with O1/O2. Compiling it with O0 (o zero) made the speed to drop to snails speed. These kind of tests really doesn't test a CPU as long as you can't disable multitasking completely and don't write it using assembly to avoid any compiler related tricks.
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: ddni (86.151.32.102) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 15:32 | File version: 1.1B |
What do you get if you build it yourself?
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: zzd10h (109.9.30.119) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 14:34 | File version: 1.1B |
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: jabirulo (2.139.107.119) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 12:04 | File version: 1.1B |
SAM460ex:
SORTBENCH 1.1 (Gunnar von Boehn)
Its a CPU benchmark that stresses CPU, DCache and branch prediction.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 K Element : 1660.98 MB/sec
2 K Element : 1662.14 MB/sec
4 K Element : 1661.23 MB/sec
8 K Element : 1629.98 MB/sec
16 K Element : 474.56 MB/sec
32 K Element : 390.30 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: rwo (95.154.21.8) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 08:29 | File version: 1.1 |
My evil Sam 666mhz gives me
1 K Element : 1006.66 MB/sec
2 K Element : 1008.71 MB/sec
4 K Element : 1009.42 MB/sec
8 K Element : 1007.09 MB/sec
16 K Element : 346.88 MB/sec
32 K Element : 267.28 MB/sec
Run from shell with no startup sequence
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: rwo (95.154.21.8) | At: 12 Nov 2016, 08:16 | File version: 1.1 |
Darn... look like I included the wrong binary in the first archive.
This new version is compiled with the right optimation -O2.. it should give you a nice increase.
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: daveyww (118.92.8.78) | At: 11 Nov 2016, 23:45 | File version: 1.1 |
Hmm, the SAM460 is pretty disappointing by comparison:
1 K Element : 1226.22 MB/sec
2 K Element : 1239.28 MB/sec
4 K Element : 1233.07 MB/sec
8 K Element : 1187.15 MB/sec
16 K Element : 445.17 MB/sec
32 K Element : 379.94 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: Lio (213.176.206.197) | At: 11 Nov 2016, 22:18 | File version: 1.1 |
on my A1XEG4 I get :
1 K Element : 1916.82 MB/sec
2 K Element : 1916.53 MB/sec
4 K Element : 1917.88 MB/sec
8 K Element : 1917.02 MB/sec
16 K Element : 1846.13 MB/sec
32 K Element : 1831.82 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: ddni (86.151.32.102) | At: 11 Nov 2016, 13:48 | File version: 1.1 |
PASEMI PA6T-1682M @1800mhz
Single core
AMIGAONE X1000
-------------------------------------------------------------
SORTBENCH 1.1 (Gunnar von Boehn)
Its a CPU benchmark that stresses CPU, DCache and branch prediction.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 K Element : 2084.88 MB/sec
2 K Element : 2096.05 MB/sec
4 K Element : 2105.75 MB/sec
8 K Element : 2134.63 MB/sec
16 K Element : 2112.34 MB/sec
32 K Element : 1712.92 MB/sec
|
| |
| |
| Comment by: ddni (86.151.32.102) | At: 11 Nov 2016, 08:59 | File version: 1.1 |
Thanks.
I wonder what scores the new Vampire 600 or 500 get?
|
| |
| |
Audio (347)